Payload CMS vs WordPress: Which Should You Choose in 2025?

Table of Contents

• Quick Comparison Overview
• Understanding the Fundamental Difference
• Performance Comparison
• Cost Analysis
• Flexibility and Customisation
• Content Editing Experience
• Security Considerations
• SEO Capabilities
• When to Choose WordPress
• When to Choose Payload CMS
• The Hybrid Approach
• Making Your Decision
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Conclusion

WordPress powers over 40% of the web. Payload CMS is the new kid on the block that developers can't stop talking about. So which one actually makes sense for your project?

Choosing between Payload CMS and WordPress is a common decision I help clients with. Both are excellent tools, but they solve different problems for different situations. I've seen businesses waste thousands choosing the wrong CMS, and I've seen others transform their online presence by switching to the right one.

This guide cuts through the marketing noise and gives you a practical comparison based on real project experience, not marketing claims. I'll share actual costs, performance data, and specific scenarios where each platform shines. By the end, you'll know exactly which CMS fits your specific needs.

Quick Comparison Overview

Before diving into details, here's a high-level summary:

Factor	Payload CMS	WordPress
Best for	Custom applications, growing businesses	Blogs, standard websites, quick launches
Learning curve	Steeper (requires developers)	Gentler (many DIY options)
Flexibility	Unlimited customisation	Plugin-dependent
Performance	Excellent (you control everything)	Variable (depends on setup)
Cost over time	Lower for growing sites	Can escalate with premium plugins
Time to launch	Longer (custom development)	Faster (templates available)
Content editing	Modern, fast interface	Familiar, widely understood

Understanding the Fundamental Difference

The core difference comes down to architecture:

WordPress is a traditional CMS where the same system handles both content management and website display. Your content lives in WordPress, and WordPress generates your web pages.

Payload CMS is a headless CMS that only manages content. It provides your content through an API, and a separate frontend (usually Next.js or another framework) displays it.

This architectural difference affects everything: how sites perform, what you can build, ongoing costs, and who can maintain it.

Performance Comparison

Performance directly impacts user experience, SEO rankings, and conversion rates. Here's how they compare:

WordPress Performance

WordPress can be fast, but it requires effort:

Challenges:

• PHP generates pages on each request (unless heavily cached)
• Plugins add database queries and slow things down
• Themes often include unused code
• Shared hosting typically underperforms

Reality check: Most WordPress sites I audit load in 3-6 seconds. Getting under 2 seconds requires significant optimisation work.

What's needed for good WordPress performance:

• Quality managed hosting (WP Engine, Kinsta) - typically the hosting cost alone is higher than complete Payload hosting
• Caching plugin properly configured
• Image optimisation
• Minimal plugins
• Clean, well-coded theme

Payload Performance

Payload paired with Next.js delivers excellent performance by default:

Advantages:

• Static generation means pages are pre-built HTML
• No database queries when users visit
• Modern hosting (Vercel, Netlify) includes global CDN
• Only the code you write gets included

Typical results: Payload + Next.js sites regularly achieve sub-1-second load times without special optimisation.

Real comparison: I rebuilt a client's WordPress site with Payload + Next.js. Same design, same content:

• WordPress: 3.4 second load time
• Payload + Next.js: 0.9 second load time

The difference came purely from architecture.

Case study: I'm currently migrating Top Grass, a Bristol landscaping company, from a legacy Classic ASP website to Payload + Next.js. Their old site scored ~35/100 on Lighthouse with 6-8 second load times. The new Payload site achieves a perfect 100/100 score with sub-second loads. Read the full case study.

Performance Verdict

Payload wins on performance, but with a caveat: a well-optimised WordPress site with premium hosting can get close. The difference is that Payload achieves fast performance by default, while WordPress requires ongoing effort to maintain it.

Cost Analysis

This is where the comparison gets interesting. The "cheaper" option depends entirely on your timeframe and growth expectations.

WordPress Costs

Initial costs:

• Domain: around 10 per year
• Hosting: from 5 to 50+ per month
• Theme: free to 100+ one-time
• Essential plugins: free to 500+ per year
• Development (if custom): from 1,500 to 10,000+

Ongoing costs:

• Hosting: from 60 to 600+ per year
• Plugin renewals: from 100 to 1,000+ per year
• Security/maintenance: from 200 to 2,000+ per year
• Premium theme updates: from 50 to 200 per year

Total Year 1 (DIY simple site): approximately 200 to 500 Total Year 1 (professional custom site): approximately 3,000 to 15,000

The hidden costs: WordPress costs often creep up. You need a forms plugin, then a security plugin, then SEO tools, then performance optimisation. Each adds either money or complexity.

Payload CMS Costs

Initial costs:

• Domain: around 10 per year
• Development: from 4,000 to 15,000+ (custom build required)
• Design (if needed): included in development or separate

Ongoing costs:

• Hosting (Payload + database): from 20 to 100 per month
• Frontend hosting (Vercel/Netlify): free to 20 per month
• Maintenance/updates: from 500 to 2,000 per year

Total Year 1: approximately 5,000 to 18,000 Total Year 2+: approximately 800 to 2,500 per year

Cost Comparison Over Time

Here's where the maths gets interesting. Let's compare a growing business site over 3 years:

WordPress (professional setup):

• Year 1: 5,000 (development) + 1,200 (hosting/plugins) = 6,200
• Year 2: 1,500 (hosting/plugins/maintenance)
• Year 3: 1,800 (costs tend to increase)
• 3-year total: approximately 9,500

Payload CMS:

• Year 1: 8,000 (development) + 800 (hosting) = 8,800
• Year 2: 1,000 (hosting/maintenance)
• Year 3: 1,000 (costs stay stable)
• 3-year total: approximately 10,800

For a standard business site, WordPress often wins on total cost.

But the equation changes with growth or complexity:

If you need advanced features, custom workflows, or significant traffic, WordPress costs escalate (premium plugins, better hosting, performance work), while Payload costs stay relatively flat.

Cost Verdict

WordPress is cheaper for: Simple sites, blogs, standard business websites, tight budgets.

Payload is cheaper for: Complex applications, high-traffic sites, businesses expecting significant growth, projects needing custom functionality that would require expensive WordPress plugins.

Flexibility and Customisation

WordPress Flexibility

WordPress's flexibility comes from its plugin ecosystem:

Strengths:

• 60,000+ plugins for almost any feature
• Thousands of themes for quick design
• Large community means lots of tutorials
• Many problems already solved

Limitations:

• Plugins can conflict with each other
• Quality varies wildly
• You're limited by what plugins offer
• Heavy customisation requires PHP knowledge
• Updates can break things

Reality: WordPress is incredibly flexible for standard website features. But when you need something genuinely custom, you often hit walls or need workarounds.

Payload Flexibility

Payload takes a different approach: unlimited flexibility, but you build what you need.

Strengths:

• No artificial limitations on what you can build
• Code-based configuration means complete control
• TypeScript provides better developer experience
• Custom fields, workflows, and logic without plugins
• API-first means content works anywhere

Limitations:

• Smaller ecosystem (fewer pre-built solutions)
• Requires development for everything
• Fewer tutorials and resources (though growing)

Reality: If you can describe it, Payload can do it. But you (or your developer) need to build it.

Flexibility Verdict

WordPress wins for: Standard features, quick implementations, when a plugin exists for what you need.

Payload wins for: Custom requirements, unique workflows, when plugins don't quite do what you need, multi-platform content delivery.

Content Editing Experience

Both systems let non-technical users manage content, but the experience differs.

WordPress Editor

Strengths:

• Familiar to millions of users
• Gutenberg block editor is powerful
• Visual editing shows roughly how content will look
• Lots of training resources available

Challenges:

• Can feel cluttered with many plugins
• Admin can be slow on cheaper hosting
• Block editor has a learning curve
• Different plugins have different interfaces

Payload Editor

Strengths:

• Clean, modern interface
• Fast (runs on modern JavaScript)
• Consistent experience throughout
• Custom fields are intuitive
• Live preview available with setup

Challenges:

• Less visual than WordPress
• Fewer users means less community support
• Training resources still developing

Editor Verdict

WordPress wins for: Users who want visual editing, those already familiar with WordPress, when training resources matter.

Payload wins for: Users who prefer clean interfaces, when content structure matters more than visual editing, fast editing workflows.

Security Considerations

WordPress Security

WordPress powers 40%+ of the web, making it a constant target.

Challenges:

• Frequent security vulnerabilities
• Plugins are common attack vectors
• Requires active security management
• Brute force attacks are constant

What's needed:

• Security plugin (Wordfence, Sucuri)
• Regular updates (core, themes, plugins)
• Strong passwords and limited users
• Web application firewall recommended

Reality: WordPress can be secure, but it requires vigilance. Most hacked WordPress sites were running outdated software or weak passwords.

Payload Security

Advantages:

• Smaller target (less widely used)
• Modern codebase with fewer legacy issues
• No plugin vulnerabilities
• You control all code

Considerations:

• Still requires security best practices
• You're responsible for server security
• Fewer automated security tools available

Security Verdict

Payload has an advantage due to smaller attack surface and modern architecture. But both can be secure with proper practices. WordPress just requires more active security management.

SEO Capabilities

WordPress SEO

Strengths:

• Plugins like Yoast and Rank Math are excellent
• Well-documented SEO practices
• Easy meta management
• Built-in features like pretty permalinks

Challenges:

• Performance can hurt SEO (Core Web Vitals)
• Plugins add complexity
• Duplicate content issues if not configured properly

Payload SEO

Strengths:

• Excellent performance helps Core Web Vitals
• Complete control over meta tags
• Clean HTML output
• Static generation great for crawling

Considerations:

• Need to implement SEO features in frontend
• Less "out of the box" than WordPress
• Requires developer input for setup

SEO Verdict

Both can achieve excellent SEO. WordPress makes it easier with plugins. Payload's performance advantage helps Core Web Vitals. The winner depends on your resources and priorities.

When to Choose WordPress

Choose WordPress when:

1. Budget is the primary concern If total project budget is under 3,000 to 4,000, WordPress is likely your only viable option for a professional site.

2. You need to launch quickly WordPress can go from zero to live in days or weeks. Payload requires custom development taking weeks to months.

3. Standard features meet your needs Blog, portfolio, basic e-commerce, membership site, standard business website - WordPress handles all of these well.

4. You want DIY capability WordPress enables business owners to manage and even build their sites. Payload always requires developer involvement for changes.

5. Plugins exist for what you need If established plugins solve your requirements, there's no reason to build custom.

6. Team is already familiar with WordPress Training costs and workflow disruption matter. Stick with what works.

When to Choose Payload CMS

Choose Payload when:

1. You're building a custom application Product configurators, client portals, multi-tenant platforms, complex e-commerce - Payload excels where WordPress struggles.

2. Performance is critical If conversion rates depend on speed, Payload's architecture advantage matters.

3. You expect significant growth Payload's costs stay stable while WordPress can become expensive with traffic and features.

4. You need custom workflows Specific approval processes, complex permissions, unique content relationships - Payload handles without expensive plugins.

5. Content needs to work across platforms Website, mobile app, digital signage - Payload's API delivers content anywhere.

6. You have development resources In-house developers or agency relationship makes Payload's power accessible.

7. Data control matters Regulated industries, specific hosting requirements, or company policies about data sovereignty.

The Hybrid Approach

Sometimes the answer isn't either/or. Consider:

WordPress for blog, Payload for application Use WordPress for content marketing (it's great for blogs) and Payload for your core product or complex features.

Start with WordPress, migrate to Payload later Launch quickly with WordPress, then rebuild with Payload when you've validated your business and have budget for custom development.

Headless WordPress Use WordPress as a headless CMS with Next.js frontend. Gets some Payload benefits while keeping WordPress familiarity. (Though this can be more complex than either pure option.)

Making Your Decision

Here's a simple framework:

Choose WordPress if:

• Budget under 4,000
• Need to launch in under 4 weeks
• Standard website features are sufficient
• No development resources available
• Team already knows WordPress

Choose Payload if:

• Custom requirements beyond standard plugins
• Performance is business-critical
• Expecting 3x+ growth in next 2 years
• Need specific workflows or permissions
• Have or can engage developers
• Want predictable long-term costs

Still unsure? Consider starting with WordPress if it meets current needs. You can always migrate to Payload later when requirements and budget grow. The reverse (Payload to WordPress) is rarely needed or beneficial.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Payload CMS free?

Yes, Payload CMS is open source and free to use. You'll pay for hosting (typically £20-100/month for the CMS and database) and frontend hosting (often free on Vercel's hobby tier). There are no licensing fees, plugin subscriptions, or premium tiers to unlock features.

Can I migrate from WordPress to Payload CMS?

Absolutely. Content can be exported from WordPress and imported into Payload, though the process requires development work to map your content structure. The complexity depends on how much custom functionality and how many plugins your WordPress site uses. For most business sites, migration takes 2-4 weeks of development time.

Is Payload CMS good for beginners?

It depends what you mean by beginner. For content editors, Payload's admin interface is clean and intuitive. For site owners who want to build or modify their own site, WordPress is more accessible. Payload requires a developer for setup and customisation, while WordPress offers more DIY options.

Does Payload CMS have a page builder?

Not in the traditional drag-and-drop sense like Elementor or Divi. Payload uses a blocks-based approach where developers define reusable content blocks, and editors assemble pages from those blocks. It's more structured than visual builders but offers better performance and consistency.

What database does Payload CMS use?

Payload supports MongoDB (document database) and PostgreSQL (relational database). MongoDB is more common for Payload projects due to its flexibility with content structures, but PostgreSQL is a solid choice if your team prefers relational databases or you have existing PostgreSQL infrastructure.

How does Payload compare to other headless CMS options like Contentful or Sanity?

Payload is self-hosted and open source, meaning you own your data and infrastructure. Contentful and Sanity are cloud-hosted with usage-based pricing that can become expensive at scale. Payload offers more customisation and lower long-term costs, while Contentful/Sanity offer faster setup and managed infrastructure.

Can Payload CMS handle e-commerce?

Yes, though it requires custom development. Payload doesn't have built-in e-commerce like WooCommerce, but you can build product catalogues, integrate with payment providers (Stripe, PayPal), and create custom checkout flows. For complex e-commerce, you might pair Payload with a dedicated e-commerce backend like Shopify's Storefront API.

Conclusion

There's no universally "better" CMS. WordPress and Payload serve different needs:

WordPress is mature, accessible, and cost-effective for standard websites. It's the right choice for most small business sites, blogs, and projects with limited budgets.

Payload CMS excels for custom applications, performance-critical sites, and growing businesses that need flexibility without escalating costs.

The best choice depends on your specific situation: budget, timeline, requirements, growth expectations, and available resources.

Need Help Deciding?

I work with both WordPress and Payload regularly and can give you an honest assessment of which fits your project.

Get in touch for a straightforward conversation about your requirements. I'll recommend whichever option actually makes sense for your situation, even if that means suggesting a simpler solution than you expected.

---

Related articles:

• From Legacy ASP to Payload CMS: Top Grass Case Study
• Why We Use Payload CMS: A Strategic Approach to Modern Content Management
• Is WordPress Still Worth It in 2025?
• Migrating from WordPress to Payload